Quote: Mating disruption for codling moth is well established as an IPM tactic inWashington orchards.Codling Moth Mating Disruption and Its Role in Washington Orchard Pest Management Programs
Washington State University Cooperative Extension
Presented at the 41st Annual IDFTA Conference, February 21-25, 1998, Pasco, Washington.
Mating disruption technology for codling moth control was first registered by the EPA in 1991 and
was used on no more than 2000 acres (809 ha) that year in North America. The acreage increased
to an estimated 45,000 acres (18,212 ha) in 1997, almost entirely located in Washington, Oregon
and California. Its use has increased most dramatically in Washington, with about 15,000 acres
(6,071 ha) treated in 1995 and close to 27,000 acres (10,927 ha) in 1997 (about 15% of the
Washington bearing acreage of pome fruits). We can expect to have more than 35,000 acres
(14,165 ha) treated in 1998 in our state (Figure 1). What factors have led to the rapidly
increasing use in Washington, and why is so much of the use concentrated in our state?
Washington Western US 15% of bearing acres 1998 est. Figure 1. Pome fruit acreage treated with codling moth mating disruption.
Codling moth is the “key” pest for most Washington apple growers, the one around which most of
our post-bloom cover sprays revolve. Unlike our midwestern and eastern counterparts, we do not
have other obligate direct fruit pests, like the plum curculio and apple maggot. With our dry
climate we spray relatively little, if at all, for fungal diseases such as apple scab, cedar apple rust
and sooty blotch. The use of codling moth mating disruption can allow Washington growers to
greatly reduce or, in some cases, even eliminate broad-spectrum insecticide use after bloom. The
result can be a reduction of control costs for codling moth and sometimes for secondary pests.
Many growers have experienced improved biological control of a number of pests, including
aphids, leafminers, mites and pear psylla, when broad-spectrum insecticide use is reduced or
Codling moth is well adapted to the warm, dry climate of central Washington, most years
completing two full generations and in some years a partial third. In contrast, California growers
must control three or four generations of this pest and levels of resistance to organophosphate
insecticides in some locations are very high. Because of this high pest pressure, and with the very
high temperatures encountered in the California Central Valley apple districts, codling moth mating
disruption has been less effective than in Washington. California growers have routinely had to
supplement mating disruption with more insecticide applications than Washington orchardists to
get adequate control and, therefore, its use has not been as cost effective.
The impact of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996 is now looming large, with the
likely loss of most of the organophosphate and carbamate insecticides we have relied upon for
much of our orchard insect control. New insecticides, such as the insect growth regulators
fenoxycarb (Comply) and tebufenozide (Confirm), can provide good control of codling moth
and some other pests when and if they are registered for use on apples (see in this volume
J. Brunner, "Integration of Multiple Tactics in Pest Management—Novel Chemicals and
Biological Control"). However, they do
not provide the same degree of control we have become
accustomed to with insecticides like azinphosmethyl or phosmet. They will benefit from being
supplemented with mating disruption, just as mating disruption itself will often need some help.
Growers cite other reasons for using mating disruption in Washington orchards. Many value the
reduced time spent spraying, with its attendant hassles and discomfort, and the reduced exposure
to insecticides, lessening the risk faced by their families, their employees and themselves. The use
of organophosphates like azinphosmethyl requires reentry intervals of 72 hours in Washington
orchards; eliminating those sprays simplifies labor management by not interfering with the
increasingly labor intensive practices used in high density plantings. Others use mating disruption,
in part because “it is the right thing to do,” demonstrating to the non-farming public that growers
are responding to concerns about pesticide use and residues.
Mating disruption works by maintaining sufficient levels of the females’ sex pheromone in the
orchard atmosphere to limit and delay the amount of mating that takes place. Pheromone
dispensers are applied high in the tree canopy by bloom time, prior to the beginning of codling
moth flight. Early on we recognized the importance of conditions that helped maintain adequate
pheromone levels in the orchard. These include flat terrain, uniform and dense canopies, minimal
wind, large treated areas, and square rather than elongate blocks to minimize the area of border
relative to the interior. Realistically, few Washington orchards met most of these criteria. We also
soon realized that mating disruption was not a simple substitute for cover sprays; too often, after
pheromone dispensers were installed, the grower stopped any sprays for codling moth and
sometimes suffered too much damage as a result. Many growers and consultants in the early
1990s were therefore skeptical of this technique. They believed that either mating disruption did
not work or that it was suitable only in orchards with low codling moth pressure, where the cost of
mating disruption, close to $140/acre at that time, far exceeded the cost of one or two cover sprays.
Three developments have served to change these perceptions and increase the use of mating
First, the pheromone dispensers themselves are now much improved when compared with the
initial versions. There have been two principal dispensers used in Washington. Isomate C+
(Pacific Biocontrol, Inc.) is applied once per season at up to 400 dispensers/acre. Checkmate CM
(Consep, Inc.) is a two-application product, using 160 dispensers/acre applied by bloom and
again about 70 days later. Both products have been improved from the original dispensers when
there were problems with inconsistent pheromone release and inadequate longevity. In fact, the
Isomate C+ dispenser, which was used on well over 80% of the Washington acreage treated in
1997, now releases codling moth pheromone into the early summer of the next year following
Second, we have learned that mating disruption needs to be supplemented periodically with
insecticide applications to keep codling moth populations at low levels. The need for supplemental
sprays varies with the block conditions and the codling moth pressure in the area. Large treated
areas may, in time, require only a single first generation cover spray every 2, 3 or more years or,
with a thorough monitoring program, just periodic sprays to hot spots or borders. Smaller blocks
with more pressure may require one or two supplemental covers each year or a complete cover
every other year with border sprays in intervening years. Mating disruption and cover sprays, to
this point mostly insecticides like azinphosmethyl and phosmet, have almost a synergistic effect
when used together. This combination has allowed mating disruption use to shift to higher codling
moth pressure orchards, where cover sprays can be reduced from four, five or more annually to
but one or two sprays within 2 years.
Third, there has been an increase in the use of the Isomate C+ dispenser at less than the full rate of
400 dispensers/acre. Close to 50% of the acreage treated with this dispenser in 1997 was at a rate
of 200-300 dispensers/acre, resulting in cost savings of up to $55-60/acre. We have learned that
with the application of one or more cover sprays there is little additional benefit in the use of 400
versus 200 dispensers. Many orchards that began with the use of the full rate have, over the
course of 2 to 3 years, reduced the amount of Isomate C+ per acre. In the past few years, many
orchardists using mating disruption for the first time have begun with the use of a half-rate,
sometimes lowering codling moth control costs even in the first year
from this pest. Table 1 provides representative scenarios of mating disruption use in two
Washington orchards. Table 2 shows the use of mating disruption over time in what was a high
Mating disruption for codling moth is not without its problems. Even with the use of a half-rate of
dispensers, many growers still find it cheaper to control codling moth with the application of one to
three cover sprays. With minimal applications of organophosphate insecticides, many Washington
growers already have good biological control of secondary orchard pests, including spider mites,
Codling moths are monitored in most Washington orchards with the use of pheromone traps. In
mating disruption blocks, this approach is complicated by the high levels of pheromone present
throughout the orchard atmosphere. We have found that the traps need to be placed much higher in
the trees and used at a higher density and that visual monitoring of fruit damage becomes more
important, all practices that take more time and increase management costs. Another concern has
been the increase in leafroller populations in many orchards where mating disruption is used.
Cover sprays for codling moth control, even though not targeted specifically for leafrollers, have
the effect of suppressing populations of this pest. When these cover sprays are reduced or
eliminated in mating disruption orchards, leafroller problems have increased. As a result, some
growers have had to include additional insecticides for leafrollers in their control programs, most
often formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt).
The Codling moth Areawide Management Program, or CAMP, is a program funded by the
USDA-Agricultural Research Service in which codling moth mating disruption has been used as
the central control tactic on sites throughout Washington, as well as in Oregon and California. The
intent of this program is to demonstrate the use of codling moth mating disruption on an areawide
basis, with neighboring growers working together to share extensive pest monitoring information
and treat large contiguous areas with pheromone. Five sites began with the CAMP in 1995,
involving about 3,100 acres. The program expanded in 1997 to include ten sites (seven in
Washington) and 9,400 acres, and 1998 will see the addition of seven new sites (six in
Washington and one in western Colorado). This program will be funded through 1999, with five
After three seasons of mating disruption, certain trends are clear in the three original Washington
codling moth populations are down, over 90% in many cases, from Year 1.
cover sprays for codling moth control are down, averaging less than one per year per
codling moth fruit damage is down, 80% or more from pre-CAMP levels.
In addition, many growers reduced the rate of Isomate C+ dispensers per acre in Year 3 (1997).
Further reductions in dispenser rates and cover sprays are planned in 1998, in light of the very low
codling moth populations that are present.
There are several new developments involving mating disruption and pheromones for orchard pest
THE “DUAL” DISPENSER
Pacific Biocontrol has registered for 1998 a “dual” dispenser, called Isomate CM/LR, that contains
both codling moth and leafroller pheromones. This dispenser has run out of both pheromones by
late July or early August, a limitation that the company hopes to overcome in future years.
Nonetheless, the users of this product in over 30 trials in Washington in 1997 reported generally
positive results for the control of both pests, particularly when supplemented with other leafroller
controls. The extent of its use will depend in large part on its price and whether it can be used
effectively at less than 400 dispensers/acre, like the Isomate C+ dispenser. “PUFFERS” OR “MISTERS”
These are mechanical devices that, in concept very similar to the fragrance dispensers found
mounted on rest room walls, instead of spewing out perfume, spray a mist containing pheromone.
Several models are under development. They have several potential advantages over
“conventional” dispensers. Because they deliver much more pheromone at a single release event
(“puff”), far fewer dispensers may be needed per acre; some trials have used one per acre or less.
The cost per acre for the devices, pheromone and installation may be less than for other dispensing
systems. Pheromone blends can be put in the canisters, allowing several different pests to be
targeted with one device. The pheromones are contained within a metal canister, protecting them
from breakdown by UV light. A timer can be incorporated into the device, allowing the
pheromone to be dispensed at selected times when the target insects are active.
To this point, I am unaware of any trials, in Washington State or elsewhere, that have successfully
demonstrated the effectiveness of “puffers” or “misters” in providing mating disruption of codling
moth. Several trials have been derailed by mechanical problems with the devices themselves:
stuck valves, degraded gaskets, congealed pheromone and more. Other tests either had very low
codling moth populations and provided no real test, or were well sprayed with insecticides to
control codling moth. With rigorous testing in 1998, and the resolution of mechanical problems,
“puffer”-type dispenser systems may yet prove the equal or superior to mating disruption systems
For many years there have been investigations of the application of pheromones for mating
disruption with spray equipment. This approach has several potential advantages when compared
with the hand-applied dispenser systems used today. The high initial investment of installing
dispensers by bloom could be reduced if pheromone is sprayed on the trees only prior to periods of
peak flight, or after the need is determined. The amount of pheromone and number of applications
could be varied to reflect the pest pressure, and conventional application equipment could be used.
Progress with this approach has been limited by the ability to formulate the pheromone in a manner
allowing it to be released for an extended period. In general, there is a large initial “burst” of
pheromone released following application, after which levels drop precipitously. For some pests,
like codling moth and leafrollers, levels of pheromone effective for mating disruption may last only
a week or two. Key to the advancement of sprayable pheromones has been the process of
microencapsulation, termed “MEC” as developed by the 3M Corporation. Pheromone is placed
within microcapsules with diameters of only 20 to 40 microns. These capsules are contained in a
formulation that can be mixed with water and sprayed onto foliage. The pheromone is then
released from the microcapsules over time.
Significant success has been achieved with Oriental fruit moth and peach tree borer. Results of
tests with the leafroller product in Washington have been only fair, but may improve with better
timing and adjustments of the rates used. A MEC leafroller product received full registration in
1997 and we will gain more experience with it in 1998. A codling moth sprayable pheromone
product has met with even less success so far, providing pheromone trap shutdown for only very
“ATTRACT AND KILL”: SIRENE CM
Sirene CM provides a new twist on mating disruption in that the males are not just confused, they
are killed. Small plot trials with Sirene CM were conducted in the Pacific Northwest in 1995 and
again in 1997 in Washington. Sirene has been developed over the past decade by the Swiss
chemical company Ciba-Geigy (now part of Novartis). This product is formulated as a thick,
sticky substance, black and tar-like in appearance, that contains codling moth pheromone
(codlemone) and permethrin, a fast-acting, synthetic pyrethroid insecticide. Using hand
applicators, the material is placed in trees as small droplets to branches or scaffold limbs.
Sirene droplets act as a sort of pseudo-female, luring in males with the release of codlemone.
Attracted to the droplet, the male attempts to mate and contacts the insecticide, in the process
picking up a lethal dose of permethrin. A Sirene application is effective for at least 5 to 6 weeks.
Sirene may be more effective than mating disruption in small blocks of less than 10 acres and
should be less affected by conditions such as steep slopes, uneven canopies, irregularly shaped
blocks or windy conditions, all of which can limit the success of mating disruption. Sirene could
be used as a supplement for mating disruption, with applications being made to orchard borders,
hot spots and/or just prior to peak moth flight. This product does have the disadvantages of
requiring significant labor for multiple applications and of leaving in the tree a persistent black
material that marks clothing and skin when contacted by thinners, pickers and others working in
the trees. Extensive field trials are planned for 1998 and full registration by the EPA is expected
Mating disruption for codling moth is well established as an IPM tactic in Washington orchards,
and recent developments, particularly with the FQPA, indicate that its use will continue to increase.
It is not a stand-alone product for codling moth control or one that can clean up a messy situation,
in contrast to materials such as azinphosmethyl and phosmet that we have relied upon for many
years. Growers will need to take their management skills up a notch or two to use mating
disruption, let alone adapt to the many changes in fruit production in general that they face. Mating
part of the increasingly integrated and complex orchard pest
management programs of Washington apple and pear growers in the coming years. ADDITIONAL READING
Brunner, J. F. 1998. Integration of multiple tactics in pest management—novel chemicals and
biological control. Compact Fruit Tree, this volume.
Table 1. A representative scenario with high and low codling moth pressure. OR High codling moth pressure: OR Low codling moth pressure:
Table 2. Example of codling moth control scenario for an actual block with high codling mothpressure (and damage) near Orondo, WA.
Isomate C+ Isomate C+ Isomate C+ Isomate C+
z It appears from blocks that have used MD for over 3 years that a supplemental cover spray will be
needed every 2 or 3 years, at least to hot spots and borders, to reliably maintain CM populationslow.
Minutes of the station leader meeting August 26, 2009 Present at the meeting: NMA, NPI, AWIPEV, Kings Bay AS Absent: NERC, NCAOR, Kings Bay Marine Laboratory (KBML) Ongoing projects/new projects Mr. Ole Bjørn Årdal attended the meeting. Maintenance work being done. The cryogen compressor has been changed. Between September 21 and 24 a group will visit to investigate possible sites f
Activation of sperm motility in striped bass viaShuyang HeKaren Jenkins-KeeranL. Curry Woods IIIaDepartment of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland,bNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USAReceived 12 March 2003; accepted 26 August 2003The objective of the present study was to identify the effect of osmolality, ions (Kþ, Hþ, Ca2þ,Mg2þ) and cAMP on the ini