Hairy Foot Warts Hilary M. Sullivan Cooperative Extension Service • College of Agriculture and Home Economics
This publication is scheduled to be updated and reissued 3/10.
Hairy foot warts were first reported in the United
with little direct labor input. Since at any given
States more than 23 years ago and have since
time approximately 14% of cattle with hairy foot
spread rapidly, becoming a major management
wart lesions will not be lame, treatment of all cattle
concern for dairy producers both in the U.S. and in
may reduce future instances of the problem. Al-
other parts of the world (Shearer, 1998). Between
though less labor intensive than topical applica-
1991 and 1994, the frequency of infection on Cali-
tions, footbaths must be properly managed. Non-
fornia dairies increased from 31% to 89% (Read
antibiotic footbaths usually contain disinfectants of
and Walker, 1991). In addition to being extremely
one kind or another, but large amounts of organic
contagious, hairy foot warts are also a very expen-
matter (manure and dirt) inactivate disinfectants
sive problem. It is estimated that hairy foot warts
and antibiotics. Therefore, the use of footbaths re-
cause 20% of all dairy lameness cases, with each in-
quires frequent changing of the bath water and/or a
cidence of lameness costing $90 to $130 (Shearer,
pre-rinse; otherwise, footbaths can become an in-
2000). In addition to milk loss, which ranges from
oculating bath more likely to spread foot warts then
20 to 50% in affected cows, hairy foot warts often
cure them. The biggest drawbacks to footbaths are
lead to reproductive problems and premature cow
cost and the lack of reliable efficacy data for some
culling. A study of cows sent to U.S. slaughter-
treatment methods. The following are some com-
houses revealed that nearly 30% of cows tested had
monly employed footbaths with their advantages
hairy foot warts on the left hind hoof (Brown,
Contrary to what the name implies hairy foot
• Antibiotics–These are a popular and effective
warts are not warts at all. Viruses cause warts; bac-
treatment for hairy foot warts. Several research
teria cause hairy foot warts. The exact causative
trials have shown the efficacy of tetracycline
agent is not known, but evidence suggests that one
and oxytetracycline footbaths. Lincomycin
or more species of spirochete of the genus Tre-
may also be used, but care must be taken be-
ponema is responsible. Treponema bacteria can be
cause it is toxic to rumen microbes and should
anaerobic or microaerophilic (require O at less
not be ingested by cattle. Hairy foot warts
than atmospheric levels) and can be parasitic to hu-
may become resistant to treatment with anti-
mans and to animals causing a range of diseases.
biotics over time (Shearer and Hernandez,
Currently, the most effective treatment is the use
of topical broad-spectrum antibiotics; however,
• Copper sulfate (CuSO )–Have been widely
treatment of hairy foot warts with antibiotics is off-
used for a number of years. Despite its use
label so consult your veterinarian before use. In ad-
throughout the industry, copper sulfate is not
dition, topical application of antibiotics is labor-
an effective treatment for hairy foot warts. In
intensive and may not be practical in a large herd
addition, this compound has recently begun
situation. One alternative to topical antibiotics is
medicated footbaths. Advantages to the use of
build-up, especially on large dairies and in
footbaths are that mass treatment can be achieved
acidic soils. Despite the relatively low risk of
To find more resources for your business, home, or family, visit the College of Agriculture and Home Economics on theWorld Wide Web at www.cahe.nmsu.edu
Cu toxicity in the Southwest’s alkaline soils,
has a limited shelf life after dilution in water.
use of copper sulfate footbaths in the parlor in
In addition, bleach can be damaging to tissues
New Mexico is considered a violation of your
and can emit harmful gases. In general, its use
wastewater discharge permit. In fact, use of
copper sulfate anywhere on the dairy is dis-
• Iodine products–Teat dips and other iodine
products have been used by dairy farms to
• Zinc sulfate (ZnSO )–Limited clinical data
control foot warts. However, any claims of ef-
exists on its efficacy. A 1990 study reported
fectiveness of these products are anecdotal.
that 3x footbaths were effective at controlling
While iodine is readily available on the dairy
the spread of hairy foot warts and treating
and works well in teat dips, it may be less ef-
mild lesions, but ineffective against more seri-
fective as a footbath product. Iodine is easily
ous lesions (Nutter and Moffit, 1990). Do not
inactivated by organic matter and like bleach
mix solutions containing Cu or Zn with anti-
requires a long contact time and products
biotics, because tetracylines can be inactivated
without emollient can be irritating to the skin.
• Peroxides–Peroxides disrupt the cellular
• Formalin (39% formaldehyde)–Several stud-
mechanisms of anaerobic bacteria. However,
ies have reported that 5% formalin treatment
in high concentrations peroxides are very
is effective in controlling hairy foot wart out-
damaging to all cells. Products such as hydro-
breaks. Formalin has a wide range of antibi-
gen peroxides are not stable and quickly lose
otic activity, it is non-corrosive, it is biode-
their effectiveness when exposed to air or or-
gradable, and use of formalin is not regulated
ganic matter. However, stabilized peroxide
by the Federal Pasteurized Milk Ordinance.
compounds are available, which have a longer-
quently because formalin loses its activityquickly when exposed to air. Formalin will not
Non-antibiotic footbaths act as disinfectant to
penetrate organic matter so hooves must be
kill the bacteria that causes hairy foot wart. When
cleaned if they are muddy or manure packed.
using a disinfectant for any purpose, four factors
In addition, application of formalin to the le-
sion can be painful. Perhaps formalin’s biggestdrawback is toxicity, which can pose a health
• The disinfectant must kill the bacteria you are
hazard to employees as well as a risk of con-
tamination of meat or milk. If formalin is to be
• The bacteria must be exposed to the disinfec-
used for the treatment and control of foot
tant for a sufficient amount of time.
warts, workers should be aware of its hazards
• The correct concentration must be used to get
and take steps to protect themselves.
• Acidified Sodium Chlorite (NaCl )–Is a
• The disinfectant must remain active in the
broad spectrum antimicrobial that has recently
situation where you will use it (i.e. changed
been approved for use in disinfecting beef and
frequently and free of contaminates).
poultry carcasses. It also is effective as a topicaldisinfectant for treating hairy foot warts when
Because of the problems associated with footbaths
applied 3x for 21 days (Britt Carson et al.,
and topical treatments, several researchers have in-
1999). Acidified Na Chlorite is easily inacti-
vestigated the use of systemic antibiotics to treat
vated by organic matter so footbaths must re-
hairy foot warts; the results again have been some-
main clean. It is very acidic (pH 2.3-3.2) and
what mixed. Read and Walker reported that all cattle
can be corrosive to stainless steel, so it may be
injected with penicillin G twice a day for three days
had healed lesions within 21 days; however, no data
• Bleach (Sodium hypochlorite)–Bleach is
were presented on reoccurrence of these lesions. In
cheap, broad spectrum and readily available.
addition, use of injectable antibiotics has meat and
However, it is also easily deactivated by or-
milk withdrawal issues. Vaccines have also been de-
ganic matter, requires a long contact time and
veloped against the bacteria that cause hairy foot
Guide B-122 • Page 2
warts. Good data still do not exist on whether these
philic; therefore, subsurface soils are a perfect
vaccines are effective. The biggest problem with
environment for them. By frequently exposing
treatment of hairy foot warts is a high rate of reoc-
these areas to sunlight and air, you can reduce
currence. Therefore, often one must talk about
control of outbreaks rather than cure.
Larger dairies have higher incidences of hairy
Options for controlling hairy foot warts on the
foot warts than smaller dairy farms. This can be at-
dairy include: management strategies, vaccination,
tributed to cattle coming into the dairy from a large
systemic or topical antibiotics, and mass treatment
number of sources. Incoming cattle are more likely
strategies such as footbaths. Talk to your veterinar-
to introduce, as well as contract, new diseases.
ian and university Extension personnel about treat-
New, young, and highly stressed animals, such as
ment and prevention options that might be right
incoming freshening heifers, are more susceptible
to hairy foot warts. Older and previously exposedcattle may develop a certain degree of immunity. Asouthern California case study reported that it was
LITERATURE CITED
four times more likely for a dairy to have a high in-
Britt, J. S., M. C. Carson, J. D. von Bredow, R. J.
cidence of hairy foot warts if replacement heifers
Condon 1999. “Antibiotic residues in milk samples
were brought into the dairy. Therefore, it may pay
obtained from cows after treatment for papillomatous
to quarantine incoming animals for several weeks,
digital dermatitis.” Journal of the American Veterinary
treating them topically for any lesions. However,
the same study reported that dairies were 20x more
Brown C.C., P. D. Kilgo, and K. L. Jacobsen. 2000.
“Prevalence of papillomatous digital dermatitis
likely to have large numbers of cases if corrals were
among culled adult cattle in the southeastern U.S.”
muddy (Brown, Kilgo, et al., 2000). While treat-
American Journal of Veterinary Research. 61:928
ment of hairy foot warts may be a management
Hernandez, J., and J. K. Shearer 2000. “Efficacy of ox-
challenge, prevention is always the best cure. Be-
ytetracycline for treatment of papillomatous digital
cause hairy foot warts are bacterial, good manage-
dermatitis lesions on various anatomic locations in
ment practices can reduce the spread of the disease.
dairy cows.” Journal of the American Veterinary MedicalAssociation. 216: 1288-90.
• Reduce the number of cows with hoof insults.
Nutter, W. T. and J. A. Moffit 1990. “Digital dermati-
An injury to the hoof predisposes a cow to infec-
tis control.” Veterinary Record. 126:200-2001
tion with Treponema, so make sure that cows
Read D. H. and R. L. Walker 1998. “Comparison of
have proper footing and do not have to spend a
papillomatous digital dermatitis and digital dermati-
lot of time standing or walking on concrete.
tis of cattle by histopathology and immunohis-tochemistry.” Proceedings of the 10th international
• Provide a clean dry housing area. Bacteria
symposium on lameness in ruminants, Lucere p268.
need moisture, deprive them of moisture and
Rebhun, W. C., R. M. Payne, J. M. King, M. Wolfe, and
S. M. Begg. 1980 “Interdigital papillomatous in dairy
• Pay special attention to areas that do not re-
cattle.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Asso-
ceive maximum sunlight. In a feedlot dairy,
most of the corral space receives maximum sun-
Shearer, J. 1998. “Lameness of dairy cattle: consequences
light exposure. However, cows tend to congre-
and causes.” Compendium Bovine Practitioner. 32: 79.
gate under the shades, especially in the sum-
Shearer, J. K. and J. Hernandez. 2000. “Efficacy of two
mer. These areas often get wet and muddy and
modified nonantibiotic formulations (Victory) for
can become a breeding ground for disease.
treatment of papillomatous digital dermatitis in diary
• Condition corrals if you do not scrape fre-
cows.” Journal of Dairy Science. 83:741-5.
quently. Treponoma bacteria are microaero-
New Mexico State University is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer and educator. NMSU and the U.S. Departmentof Agriculture cooperating. Printed March 2005 Las Cruces, NM Guide B-122 • Page 3
Occupational Health – Zoonotic Disease Fact Sheet #6 SPECIES: laboratory, domestic and wild species AGENT: Campylobacter (Vibrio) fetus ss. jejuni, a gram negative, microaerophilic, curved, motile rod that is worldwide in distribution. RESERVOIR AND INCIDENCE: isolated from laboratory animals including dog, cat, hamsters, ferrets (>60 % in one study), nonhuman primates, rabbit
Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) Announces Voluntary Worldwide Withdrawal of VIOXX MSD today announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal of VIOXX (rofecoxib), its arthritis and acute pain medication. The Company’s decision, which is effective immediately, is based on new, three year data from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the APPROVe [Adenomatous Polyp Preven